16 / July / 2026 Can AI help overstretched peer reviewers? Researchers advocate using AI to screen manuscripts, detect fraud, and support editors, while warning of risks to process integrity By Daniel Dieb
24 / June / 2026 When science turns on those who get it right The Economist journalist Matt Kaplan explores why scientific paradigms are so resistant to change—and the price paid by researchers who dare challenge the consensus By Diogo Rodriguez
22 / June / 2026 Why feeding AI with documents is not enough for high-quality scientific review Researcher recommends an incremental approach to analyzing papers, enabling greater control, traceability, and critical thinking By Juliana Protásio
19 / June / 2026 AI shifts from competitive edge to key competence for researchers ResearchComp update highlights the need for researchers across all fields to understand the uses, limitations, and risks of the technology By Daniel Dieb
15 / June / 2026 Scientific writing: a step-by-step guide to the ethical use of AI Tools can automate tasks and refine text, but transparency and human involvement remain the cornerstones of scientific output By Juliana Protásio
11 / June / 2026 ChatGPT and other AI redefine scientific literature review Study shows how tools such as ChatGPT, Elicit, and Research Rabbit can speed up literature reviews without replacing researcher analysis By Arthur Almeida
28 / May / 2026 “The risk isn’t AI, but delegating intellectual work to the machine,” researcher says Fernanda Scussel believes artificial intelligence tools can expedite research, but they require careful checks, well-crafted prompts, and clarity about authorship By Gabriela Monteiro
22 / May / 2026 AI guide for science: Key tools for producing novel research papers João Brainer, a clinical researcher at Einstein, explains the potential and limitations of the AI technologies transforming academic output By Juliana Protásio
13 / May / 2026 Artificial intelligence: how does it generate uncertainty in science? See what the expert says Sociologist Glauco Arbix of USP says the current scenario requires not only technical proficiency, but also critical reflection on the role of the researcher By Editorial staff
07 / May / 2026 Experienced researchers frequent among authors in predatory journals Pressure to publish and loopholes in Qualis favor journals that forgo peer review and guarantee quick publication By Samuel Fernandes
